Category: Democrats

Colbert off the ballot

1 November, 2007 (15:02) | Democrats | By: Phil Ayres

Democracy has been derailed!!!!  The Dems in SC have voted to keep Stephen Colbert off the ballot. 

The party’s executive council met Thursday afternoon in Columbia to
decide which candidates met the criteria to be placed on the ballot,
and Colbert didn’t make the cut, executive director Joe Werner said.
Colbert has said he will not file for the Republican party ballot
because of the $35,000 fee, so the move likely ends his bid to
officially run for president in South Carolina. The host of Comedy Central’s “The Colbert Report” filed his papers Thursday morning.
To get on the ballot, a candidate must demonstrate two requirements:
that he or she is viable nationally and has spent time campaigning in
the state.

Powered by ScribeFire.

More on Jon Crisp’s comments

24 August, 2007 (16:56) | Democrats | By: Phil Ayres

Ned Williams discusses the comments in the Nashville Scene concerning Jon Crisp’s statement that “Dean is truly a rich, Vanderbilt imported, chablis sipping, Country Clubbing, Private Schooling, Volvo driving, Massachusetts liberal and the African American’s in Nashville know that he is hard pressed to relate to their plight in life.” It is a free country, and you can say whatever you want.  But, this is too ridiculous and stupid too every sway anyone’s opinion.
But, as I read the article, I am particularly perturbed by this statement…

 Karl Dean worked tirelessly for years to release some of Nashville’s most violent criminals back onto our streets as Metro’s Public Defender, and now after he’s decided to run for the office of mayor of Nashville, he’s got a plan on crime! Outrageous!”

Now, this is the second time I have heard this about how  “Karl Dean worked tirelessly for years to release some of Nashville’s most violent criminals back onto our streets as Metro’s Public Defender”.  The first time I heard it was out of the mouth of Bob Clement.   So, it appears the Crisp is working through the list of the Clement campaign’s talking points.

And, if so, Clement should be forced to answer for this comment.  I have, yet, to hear him offer an explanation on this one.  Do Jon Crisp and Bob Clement truly believe that we don’t need Public Defenders?  Should we just allow criminals to be prosecuted without a defense?  Because, that is essentially what they are suggesting.  If you want to blame anyone for violent criminals being released onto the street, don’t blame Karl Dean.  He was doing his job.  Why don’t you blame the lackluster prosecutors who lost the cases?

I guess this whole issue burns me up because I see it as pure political button pushing.  Public defenders are vital to the criminal justice system.  It is a legitimate and highly important calling.  And, to criticize a man for serving the community in that capacity… well, that is absurd.  If anything, we should be applauding our public defenders.  You would be shocked to know how little these public servants make - compared to their counterparts in private practice.   It is a worthy calling and a very important job.

Bill Richardson’s ties to prostitution

17 August, 2007 (09:11) | Democrats, Uncategorized | By: Phil Ayres

Well, not really… but, this is not the kind of press any campaign wants…

One of Democratic presidential candidate Bill Richardson’s top organizers in rural Nevada resigned Thursday after the campaign learned he had worked for a brothel and was wanted on a felony arrest warrant in California.

I guess most campaigns won’t turn down good help.  But, this is probably not the kind of help you want - if you are running for President of the United States… Governor of Nevada… well, maybe, it is okay.

Democratic Candidates and their puzzling stance on Same Sex Marriage

10 August, 2007 (08:02) | Barack Obama, John Edwards, 2008 Presidential Race, Hillary Clinton, Democrats, Uncategorized | By: Phil Ayres

I am greatly amused when I watch the Democratic candidates for President squirm on the issue of same sex marriage.  Clearly, the country does not support same sex marriage.  The polls show that.  And, since they are Democrats, it is easy to box them into a corner and call them “whack-job” liberals.  So, after Dukakis, Mondale, among others… they don’t want to go down that road.

So, to keep from going down that road, they take positions that say pretty much nothing.  Here is what they said at the most recent debate … as well as what they really meant:

Hillary…

Asked what was at the heart of her opposition to same-sex marriage, Sen. Hillary Clinton said, “I prefer to think of it as being very positive about civil unions.”

“It’s a personal position,” she said. “For me, we have made it very clear in our country that we believe in equality. How we get to full equality is the debate we’re having.”

Translated… “for political purposes and to get elected, I am opposed to same-sex marriage… though I really believe in it.  Don’t worry.  After I am elected, I will have a change of heart - if politically feasible.”

Edwards…

John Edwards, a former senator from North Carolina and the Democratic Party’s 2004 vice-presidential nominee, offered an apology for a previous statement that his religious faith was at the heart of his opposition to same-sex marriage.

“I shouldn’t have said that,” said Edwards, who has previously said he has struggled with his position. “I believe to my core in equality. My campaign for the presidency is about equality across the board.”

“All I can tell you is where I am today,” he said. “I do not support same-sex marriage.”

Translated… “Wow, I didn’t know this was going to cause such a huge uproar.  Politically, the country does not favor same-sex marriage… look, people, my hands are tied.  I can’t and don’t have any more explanation or justification why I believe what I believe.  There is no way in hell my flegling campaign will have any shot to continue - if I support this.  Come on!!!!”

Obama…

Sen. Barack Obama said his view is that “we should try to disentangle what has historically been the issue of the word ‘marriage,’ which has religious connotations to some people, from the civil rights that are given couples.”

“My job as president is going to be to make sure that the legal rights that have consequences on a day-to-day basis for loving same-sex couples all across the country … are recognized and enforced,” he said.

Translated… “Don’t worry, people.  When I get elected, I will work around this whole “marriage” word and hope people won’t notice.  All I can tell you is that right now people are not in favor of same-sex marriage.  So, for me to admit what I really believe is death to my chances of beating this maniacal woman to my left.”

Behind each of their words lies an even greater meaning.  But, bottom line, their words are easy to decipher.  Yes, they oppose same-sex marriage… but, they really don’t want to;  they just know they have to.

Bredesen as a VP candidate?

31 July, 2007 (11:48) | Barack Obama, Phil Bredesen, 2008 Presidential Race, Hillary Clinton, Democrats, Uncategorized | By: Phil Ayres

It makes perfect sense.  Think about it….

No matter what some bloggers may say, Bredesen is a centrist Democrat from a conservative state who has shown that his brand of politics can win - even as Republicans dominate.

Frankly, in retrospect, Bryson had no shot at beating Bredesen because people are happy with the job he is doing.  To oust an incumbent, it takes more than a good candidate…. you have to provide the electorate with a reason NOT to vote for the guy in the office!

So, where does that leave Bredesen?… in a perfect position to be a Democratic VP candidate.  Look, if either Hillary or Obama get the nomination, Bredesen makes perfect sense.  He is perceived as being centrist; they are not.  They need a southerner to balance themselves out, geographically.

And, Bredesen will go along with it.  I seriously doubt that he has higher aspirations in the future.  Let’s face it.  He has no charisma.  He does not have the charisma that one needs to become President.  But, he is enough of a work horse… that people could back him for Vice-President.  So, it would not bother him as much to latch himself to a potentially unsuccessful effort.

Jake Butcher — a Tennessee Tragedy

3 May, 2007 (02:14) | Tennessee History, Knoxville, Fred Thompson, Democrats | By: Phil Ayres

Yesterday, I discussed the 1982 World’s Fair and one of the primary individuals responsible for the Fair being in Knoxville, Jake Butcher.  It has been a while since I thought about Jake Butcher.  So, I had to do a little research on him.  No doubt, if the blogosphere had been in existence in 1982-’83, it would have been all the buzz about Butcher.  In fact, if the blogosphere had been around at any point in the 1970s and early 80s, Butcher would have been a frequent topic of discussion.

Jake Buther’s life would have made a great movie.  It still could be … if any of you producer types are reading this post.  Butcher and his brother C.H. grew up in Union County, Tennessee, where they learned the banking business.  Butcher went to U.T., and then into the Marine Corps.  Following his time in the military, he married Sonya Wilde (1962), an actress whose career was on the rise, at the time of the marriage.

Around 1968, Jake and his brother C.H. began buying banks around East Tennessee.  By 1974, Jake and his brother had acquired 8 banks, including the region’s largest bank, the Hamilton County Bank (which Butcher turned into the United American Bank).  Butcher’s insatiable appetite for power and fortune continued to fuel his growing empire, which, at one point, was responsible for 50% of all loans, in Knoxville.

While Butcher’s business resume continued to flourish, his political resume developed.  In 1974, Jake ran for Governor, but lost to Blanton in the Democratic primary.  The Butcher brothers continued to be a powerful force in Democratic circles throughout the mid-70s.  Butcher ran again for Governor, again, in 1978, and received the Democratic nomination.  He, ultimately, lost to Lamar Alexander.  But, due to Blanton’s scandal involving his pardoning of criminals with the Tennessee Parol Board, Lamar Alexander had to be brought into office early.

Though Butcher lost the 1978 election, he continued to remain a powerful force.  And, in 1982 he was instrumental in bringing the World’s Fair to Knoxville.  Around this time, federal regulators began to investigate unlawful banking practices in East Tennessee.  Their trail ultimately led to the doors of the Butcher banks.  In 1985, Butcher and his brother pled guilty to charges of bank fraud, after federal regulators and state authorities discovered that the Butcher empire was merely a crumbling house of cards built on forged documents, bad, unsecured loans, and sheer fraud.

Butcher served 7 years of his sentence.  He was released in 1992.  According to reports, he resettled to an area in Georgia, where he has worked for a Toyota dealer and also as a real estate developer. 

The Butcher story is truly a sad Tennessee tragedy.  At one point, many people would probably have argued that Jake Butcher was the most powerful man in the State of Tennessee.  He truly saw the heights of success and the depths of despair.  I would be curious to know more about Butcher’s life, today.  Is he still married, etc.?  Has anyone had any encounters with him, over the years? 

The city of Knoxville is still filled with the legacy and ghosts of Jake and his brother (who passed away in 2002).  While I was in school in Knoxville, I was told that - at their financial height - the Butcher brothers each had one of the 2 large towers that fill the Knoxville skyline today.  To find out about the Butchers, you simply have to ask a few Knoxville locals.  Many people met their financial ruin due to the fraud and dishonesty of the Butcher brothers.  And, though people in Nashville have, largely, forgotten about the Butcher brothers, many people in Knoxville will never forget.  Can you see why I think that this would be an excellent movie?

Butcher has impacted politics in Tennessee - and maybe even nationally - forever.  Many have said that Fred Thompson’s political success is, partially, due to the face recognition provided by his movie career.  But, Fred owes his movie career - partially - to Butcher’s failures.  Had Jake Butcher defeated Blanton in 1974, there would have been no Thompson movie career, because there would have been no Blanton scandals (Perhaps, though, there would have been Butcher scandals!).

Fred’s first role came in a movie called Marie.  Fred played himself as the attorney for Marie Ragghianti, the employee of the Tennessee Parole Board who took on the corrupt Governor Blanton.  The movie was criticized by many - all except for a first-time actor by the name of Fred Thompson. 

Fred Thompson’s movie career is not the only enduring legacy of Jake Buther.  When you drive through Knoxville and look at the Sunsphere or World’s Fair Park, you can think of Jake Butcher.  He represents all that is great about America.  He represents the fact that someone in this country can rise to the heights of power - from somewhat humble beginnings.  But, he also represents the hubris and the potential for corruption by those who pursue power and financial fortunes at all cost.  In a sense, he is a reflection of what is best about us as Americans, as well as what is worst about us as humans.

I would be interested in hearing any comments that anyone has about Jake Butcher, any interactions that they have had, as well as any memories that you would like to recall.

As usual, Barbara Boxer is all class

13 January, 2007 (08:55) | Democrats | By: Phil Ayres

Clearly, the insinuation here was that “you don’t have kids.  How can you appreciate the sacrifice of these families?”  She thought this little exchange would fly under the radar and go unnoticed.  But, it was inexcusable.  And, she owes Condi and apology.  End of story…

Obama for President?

22 October, 2006 (21:32) | Democrats, Uncategorized | By: Phil Ayres

Barack Obama is considering a run for President.  Nothing else to say on this now except he will be a viable, tough candidate and I won’t be voting for him.

Clement running for Mayor

31 March, 2006 (06:27) | Democrats | By: Phil Ayres

This guy has absolutely no idea what to do with his life outside of running for public office.

Limiting the growth of government in Tennessee

22 March, 2006 (08:08) | Democrats | By: Phil Ayres

Bob K. has a good post on Bryson’s proposal that would effectively limit the growth of government programs in Tennessee.  Bryson’s plan essentially limits government spending to the rate of growth of Tennessee’s population and economy.  This seems like a good idea.  Naturally, he will face opposition from the likes of Tuke, Cohen and the Democrats in the General Assembly.  But, hopefully, Republicans, and reasonable Democrats will get behind his plan.