<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who is al Qaeda voting for for President?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tennesseetalk.com/who-is-al-qaeda-voting-for-for-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tennesseetalk.com/who-is-al-qaeda-voting-for-for-president/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:24:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron</title>
		<link>http://www.tennesseetalk.com/who-is-al-qaeda-voting-for-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-63072</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tennesseetalk.com/?p=707#comment-63072</guid>
		<description>Yep, it&#039; s one big al Qaeda conspiracy, no doubt funded by ACORN and the Obamanation. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, it&#8217; s one big al Qaeda conspiracy, no doubt funded by ACORN and the Obamanation. <img src='http://www.tennesseetalk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.tennesseetalk.com/who-is-al-qaeda-voting-for-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-63062</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tennesseetalk.com/?p=707#comment-63062</guid>
		<description>&quot;So, don’t you think an endorsement by al Qaeda is really a &#039;hopeful endorsement&#039; of Obama.&quot;  Even though you didn&#039;t end that with a question mark I&#039;ll just assume you were asking a question and answer you very briefly...NO effin way.

So according to Jim Woosley and apparently you as well, when AQ supports Mccain it&#039;s a sneaky reverse psychology technique.

But Mccain&#039;s own web site talks about how hezbalala has said some very nice things about Obama.

In summary, if terrorists support Obama we must take it on face value, but if terrorists support McCain, we can only assume that they are trying to trick us into voting for Obama.  Oh.My.&quot;god&quot;

This should have been a non-issue in the first place because it was just some contributor on a militant web site.  But instead of just letting it die in the mud Mccain HAD to have a conference with reporters about it.  

I hope AQ expand on their reverse psychology campaign.  I can&#039;t wait to see the headline, &quot;New Bin Laden video shows him reading porno mags.&quot;  Then maybe he&#039;ll circulate a viral photo all over the internet of himself concentrating really hard coloring a picture of an Israeli flag with a caption that says, &quot;I f*ckin&#039; love Jews.&quot;

And then If everything goes to plan, Obama will be in office, we&#039;ll all stop looking at porn vowing only to read the ku&#039;rawnz while we&#039;re on the toilette, and sever our ties with Israel.  If only we had seen through those sneaky tactics, Mccain could be in office and we could have our porn and hotdogs and Jesus juice.

You were right about America being able to bankrupt itself without any help though.  Greenspan testified today before congress and I think the phrase that pays was when he said, and I&#039;m paraphrasing, &quot;banks can&#039;t regulate themselves without screwing over shareholders and ruining their institutions? Who knew?&quot;

Christopher Cox was the phrase that pay runner up when he said, &quot;somewhere in this terrible mess, laws were broken.&quot;  Indeed, Mr. Chairman, but unfortunately the industry has been so deregulated you&#039;ll be hard pressed to find those pesky &quot;wrong doers.&quot;  Whereas you could probably find plenty of cases where they were operating within the law, but still contributed to the crisis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So, don’t you think an endorsement by al Qaeda is really a &#8216;hopeful endorsement&#8217; of Obama.&#8221;  Even though you didn&#8217;t end that with a question mark I&#8217;ll just assume you were asking a question and answer you very briefly&#8230;NO effin way.</p>
<p>So according to Jim Woosley and apparently you as well, when AQ supports Mccain it&#8217;s a sneaky reverse psychology technique.</p>
<p>But Mccain&#8217;s own web site talks about how hezbalala has said some very nice things about Obama.</p>
<p>In summary, if terrorists support Obama we must take it on face value, but if terrorists support McCain, we can only assume that they are trying to trick us into voting for Obama.  Oh.My.&#8221;god&#8221;</p>
<p>This should have been a non-issue in the first place because it was just some contributor on a militant web site.  But instead of just letting it die in the mud Mccain HAD to have a conference with reporters about it.  </p>
<p>I hope AQ expand on their reverse psychology campaign.  I can&#8217;t wait to see the headline, &#8220;New Bin Laden video shows him reading porno mags.&#8221;  Then maybe he&#8217;ll circulate a viral photo all over the internet of himself concentrating really hard coloring a picture of an Israeli flag with a caption that says, &#8220;I f*ckin&#8217; love Jews.&#8221;</p>
<p>And then If everything goes to plan, Obama will be in office, we&#8217;ll all stop looking at porn vowing only to read the ku&#8217;rawnz while we&#8217;re on the toilette, and sever our ties with Israel.  If only we had seen through those sneaky tactics, Mccain could be in office and we could have our porn and hotdogs and Jesus juice.</p>
<p>You were right about America being able to bankrupt itself without any help though.  Greenspan testified today before congress and I think the phrase that pays was when he said, and I&#8217;m paraphrasing, &#8220;banks can&#8217;t regulate themselves without screwing over shareholders and ruining their institutions? Who knew?&#8221;</p>
<p>Christopher Cox was the phrase that pay runner up when he said, &#8220;somewhere in this terrible mess, laws were broken.&#8221;  Indeed, Mr. Chairman, but unfortunately the industry has been so deregulated you&#8217;ll be hard pressed to find those pesky &#8220;wrong doers.&#8221;  Whereas you could probably find plenty of cases where they were operating within the law, but still contributed to the crisis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

