Why Barack Obama beat John McCain solidly
Yesterday, I received an e-mail from an internet marketer, Rich Schefren. In his e-mail, Rich attributed Obama’s win to the power of his social media marketing. In the last week, I have heard a number of explanations of Obama’s victory. The power of his social media organization was certainly impressive. Rich Schefren pointed out that:
–Since the conventions, blog posts mentioning Obama outnumbered those referencing McCain by more than 3 to 1.
–Obama’s number of MySpace friends grew steadily over the past few months while McCain’s remained relatively flat. By election day, Obama had almost 4 times the number of friends McCain had
–While those MySpace figures are remarkable, the Twitter stats are even more eye-popping. Obama had nearly TWENTY FOUR times the amount of followers that McCain had.
…
And it doesn’t end there. I found similar numbers for FaceBook and YouTube usage as well, with Obama clearly outpacing McCain.
Obama’s tactic was a masterpiece. It doesn’t matter if you are a PPC Web Spy or not–targeting the younger, more technically literate crowd (many who had never voted or even bothered to register) and hit them right where they live–on social networking landscape.
All of what Rich pointed out is very true. Obama did an incredible job of mobilizing supporters online. That is one great benefit for campaigns on the web. The web gives you the opportunity to organize supporters cheaply. And, that is critical for a campaign. No longer do you have to pick up the phone and call 1,000 supporters. Just Twitter it one time and have 1,000 people read that Tweet. No longer do you have to spend thousands to find additional sources of funds. Just blast out an e-mail and watch the money come in.
But, why was Obama able to accumulate all of these MySpace friends and McCain was not? I have been telling people in the last few weeks that McCain NEVER could have mobilized that kind of online support for one reason. It is all about the candidate.
In Primary Colors, one of my favorite movies, the Billy Bob Thorton character (who was supposed to be James Carville) kept discussing the importance of TB’s to a campaign, or “True Believers”. Web support starts with a core of TBs. That’s how the social media ball gets rolling. After the early adopter TB’s come onboard, then, it becomes acceptable for others to get involved – because their friends are there. In order to have those TB’s, you have to have a vision and a mission – something that the McCain campaign lacked.
No doubt, I voted for John McCain like millions of others. But, why did we vote for him? Was it the power of his vision or ideas? I don’t think so. Most of the Republicans I know were never excited about the McCain campaign. They were terrified of Barack Obama. But, in reality, what was the McCain campaign about? What was the vision? Give me 3 quick bullet points that the McCain campaign was about. You can’t. Because, his message was all over the place. Actually, his message was “don’t vote for Obama”. Plain and simple.
And, in order to succeed online, a campaign has to bring in TBs. Building a web campaign presence is about attracting TBs. A campaign must have a vision… a unifying, compelling vision that will attract youthful supporters who are tech savvy to get online and get involved – something that the McCain campaign lacked and, yet, something that Obama did so well.
Comments
Comment from Phil Ayres
Time: November 12, 2008, 12:32 pm
Yeah, like him or not, you really have to tip your hat to his campaign team. They did a masterful job.
Comment from Gary
Time: November 13, 2008, 12:30 am
Beyond just social media President Elect Obama used an entire new media strategy to pull off the land slide. I had a feeling the next president would be a podcaster. He had his message everywhere. YouTube, mobile alerts, every myspace spinoff site, podcasts, and (my favorite) viral internet content. First there was Obama girl, then the Yes We Can music video, and then therealmccain.com videos. He harnessed the energy of people who can’t help emailing funny pictures to everybody. My favorite was the McCain tongue photoshop contest (http://blog.wfmu.org/freeform/2008/10/photoshop-conte.html)
An unsung hero in all this would be the FightTheSmears.com Every time I got a stupid email telling me that Obama played basketball instead of visiting the troops or that he was a “muzlum” I would “reply all” with the link to that exact topic on fightthesmears.com
Which leads me to another point about how weak the attacks against President Elect Obama were. “We don’t know nothin’ ’bout this guy!!” Uh, hi. Are you living under a rock? Have you not the google, or the youtubes, or even the internets? What do you want to know about him, I can look it up on my phone while we’re standing here talking. Also, beating your chest about how you’re more experienced than your opponent and then picking a running mate whom no one has ever heard of in their entire fucking life isn’t the best strategy in world.
Comment from Phil Ayres
Time: November 13, 2008, 8:33 am
Yep, McCain made a lot of mistakes. But, so did Republicans, in general. They picked the wrong candidate.
Pingback from obama, communicator | The Blog of Kevin Thompson
Time: November 15, 2008, 10:18 pm
[...] than McCain, which means Barrack had a much more engaged and energized constituency. As noted by Phil Ayres, Barrack’s vision and leadership played a large part in mobilizing his supporters (you [...]













Comment from Kevin
Time: November 12, 2008, 12:17 pm
Well put, Phil. I agree that Obama did a masterful job leveraging social media to grow and nurture his base, but it all starts with a compelling vision for the future. Obama was a much better marketer than McCain. Marketing today is about spreading ideas effectively. Obama’s message went viral. People loved him. Even though he got called on the carpet for using phrases like “spreading the wealth” and “selfish” to justify his taxing philosophy, it didn’t matter because his supporters were so engulfed with Obama-mania, an attack on him was an attack on them.